Why Your Nutrition System Determines Your Availability and Late-Match Performance

Introduction

Elite football is a repeated-sprint, high-intensity intermittent sport where fatigue builds across a match and can persist into the following days (Mohr et al., 2005; Silva et al., 2018). That matters because most performance problems in professional football aren’t about “one bad day”—they’re about not being fully ready again when the next high-load training session or match arrives.

Sports nutrition must be executed in real environments: variable kick-off times, travel, heat, congested fixtures, limited opportunities to drink during play, and the need for consistent technical output late in matches (Mohr et al., 2005; Silva et al., 2018). This article focuses on practical actions grounded in the evidence you can implement immediately (Impey et al., 2018; McDermott et al., 2017; Mountjoy et al., 2014; Poulios et al., 2018; Collins & Rollo, 2014; Oliveira et al., 2017; Jeukendrup, 2017; Jarrett et al., 2025; Scheiman et al., 2019; Ferraresi et al., 2016; Leal-Junior et al., 2019).

The Performance Problem Footballers Actually Face: Residual Fatigue + Short Turnaround

Football fatigue isn’t just “tired legs.” Match play causes fatigue during the game and can leave residual effects that reduce readiness for subsequent training and matches (Mohr et al., 2005; Silva et al., 2018). When fixtures are congested, those residual effects become more relevant because recovery windows shrink (Silva et al., 2018).

What this means for your nutrition: Your plan must do two jobs simultaneously:

1. Support match performance
2. Accelerate restoration of readiness post-match

That requires a weekly system (carbohydrate periodization), match-day execution, hydration monitoring, recovery nutrition, and risk-managed supplements—not “good intentions” (Impey et al., 2018; McDermott et al., 2017; Poulios et al., 2018; Collins & Rollo, 2014).

Energy Availability and RED-S: The Hidden Limiter of Performance and Availability

Low energy availability is central to RED-S and can carry health and performance consequences for athletes (Mountjoy et al., 2014). In professional football, the practical risk is simple: players may under-eat (especially carbohydrates) relative to load, particularly across busy weeks and travel.

Actionable rule: If you’re performing at elite level, energy availability isn’t optional—it’s a performance and availability variable (Mountjoy et al., 2014).

Practical Target

Aim for energy availability ≥ 30–40 kcal/kg fat-free mass/day to avoid low-energy-availability symptoms and support performance and recovery (Mountjoy et al., 2014).

On heavy days, this often means total intake around 40–50 kcal/kg body mass for many elite players, then scaling down on lighter days (Mountjoy et al., 2014).

Athlete Checklist (Weekly)

• If you feel “flat” late in matches, first check if you’re consistently under-fueling across the week (Mountjoy et al., 2014)
• If you’re cutting intake on light days, make sure it doesn’t spill into moderate/high days (Mountjoy et al., 2014)

Carbohydrates: Periodize to the Work Required (Then Win Match Day)

Carbohydrate periodization is a structured approach to align carbohydrate availability with the demands of training and performance (Impey et al., 2018). In football, carbohydrate strategy should protect repeated high-intensity output and late-match execution (Impey et al., 2018; Rollo & Williams, 2023; Pueyo et al., 2024).

Practical Carbohydrate Periodization Targets

Use a simple day-type approach:

• Heavy training or match day (high running load / 90+ min match): 6–8 g/kg/day
• Moderate day: 4–6 g/kg/day
• Light / recovery / tactical day: 3–4 g/kg/day

Emphasize higher carbohydrate days in congested weeks and in the 24–36 hours pre-match (Impey et al., 2018; Pueyo et al., 2024).

Weekly Structure Example

Assuming Saturday match (adjust to your schedule):

• Match day: High carbohydrate (6–8 g/kg)
• Post-match (same day + next day): Keep carbohydrates high if turnaround is short
• Recovery/low-load day: 3–4 g/kg
• Moderate training days: 4–6 g/kg with carbohydrates placed around key sessions
• Pre-match day: 5–7 g/kg with easily digested carbohydrate sources

These aren’t “diet rules.” They’re performance rules because they match fuel supply to work demand (Impey et al., 2018).

Evidence That Structured Carbohydrate Manipulation Matters

In elite football players, improved physical performance (GPS-based outcomes) was reported after a structured intervention involving carbohydrate loading followed by a low-carbohydrate phase (Kazemi et al., 2023). The key lesson isn’t that every athlete should copy the same sequence—it’s that carbohydrate structure can measurably affect outputs when applied systematically (Impey et al., 2018; Kazemi et al., 2023).

Match-Day Nutrition Playbook (90–120 Minutes): What to Do and When

3–4 Hours Pre-Kick-Off (Main Meal)

• Carbohydrates: 2–3 g/kg in the 3–4 hours pre-kick-off
• Protein: 0.3 g/kg
• Keep fat and fiber low enough to reduce gastrointestinal distress (Jeukendrup, 2017; Rollo & Williams, 2023)

60–90 Minutes Pre-Kick-Off (Top-Up)

• Carbohydrates: 0.5–1 g/kg via an easily tolerated option (sports drink / snack)

During Match (and Extra Time)

• Carbohydrates: 30–60 g/hour (drinks, gels, chews) when tolerated
• Fluids: Individualized plan (often 300–600 mL per half; more in heat)

Execution rule: Nothing new on match day—every product and timing strategy must be practiced in training first (Jeukendrup, 2017).

Immediate Post-Match (0–4 Hours)

For rapid turnaround:

• Carbohydrates: 1–1.2 g/kg/hour for 3–4 hours when fast recovery is needed
• Protein: 0.3–0.4 g/kg in the first recovery meal/snack
• Fluids: Replace 150% of body mass lost (see hydration section)

Why Protein Timing Matters in Football Congestion

Post-game high protein intake can enhance recovery of football-specific performance when you’re managing congested fixtures (Poulios et al., 2018). When you’re playing twice in 3-4 days—midweek then weekend—how you fuel immediately after matches becomes critical to maintaining your output.

Strategic protein timing post-match helps accelerate restoration of the physical qualities you need on the pitch: sprint speed, repeated sprint ability, jump height, and change-of-direction sharpness. During fixture congestion, you’re working with tight 48-72 hour recovery windows, and that’s where optimized protein intake makes the difference.

Higher post-game protein supports muscle protein synthesis, reduces muscle damage markers, and speeds up neuromuscular recovery. This matters because accumulated fatigue from back-to-back matches doesn’t just drop your performance—it increases your injury risk when you need to be at your sharpest.

The Practical Application

Consider periodizing your nutrition to match your fixture density. You don’t need the same protein intake year-round, but when you’re in a heavy run of matches, ramping up post-game protein gives you a tangible recovery advantage. When the schedule is relentless and margins are tight, this kind of targeted fueling can be what keeps you performing at your standards rather than just getting through games.

Post-game protein becomes especially critical when:

• You have less than 72 hours between competitive matches
• You’re playing in multiple competitions simultaneously (league + cup fixtures)
• You’re managing minor muscle strains or recovering from contact-heavy matches
• Training load remains high between matches due to tactical preparation

The research specifically examining football players shows that those who implement structured post-match protein strategies maintain better performance markers across congested periods compared to those relying on standard team meal protocols alone (Poulios et al., 2018).

Hydration: Monitor, Individualize, and Use the Key Windows

Fluid replacement guidance for physically active athletes emphasizes planned hydration strategies and individualized needs (McDermott et al., 2017). Elite football adds practical constraints: limited opportunities to drink during play and high variability in sweat losses across environments.

Heat Changes the Game

Elite footballers show substantial sweating responses in heat training (Shirreffs et al., 2005). Fluid balance and urine markers can vary by environment, playing position, sex, and competitive level—so a one-size plan is unreliable (Sebastiá-Rico et al., 2024).

When you’re training or competing in hot conditions, your sweat rate can increase dramatically compared to temperate environments. What works for a winter match in Northern Europe won’t be adequate for summer pre-season in warmer climates or matches played in heat and humidity. Individual differences matter too: defenders covering less total distance but engaging in more physical duels may have different fluid needs than midfielders covering 11-12 km per match.

Position-specific demands also influence hydration strategy. Central midfielders typically cover the most distance and may have the highest total fluid losses. Goalkeepers have lower running volumes but limited drinking opportunities and may experience dehydration from standing in direct sun. Wide players making repeated sprints need fluid strategies that support high-intensity repeated efforts without causing gastrointestinal discomfort.

Practical Hydration Targets

• Pre-match (3–4 hours before): 5–7 mL/kg fluid
• If urine remains dark: Add 3–5 mL/kg
• Post-match: Replace 150% of body mass lost (e.g., 1 kg loss → 1.5 L over next hours), including sodium to aid retention

These strategies align with the principle of individualized fluid replacement and monitoring emphasized in applied hydration guidance (McDermott et al., 2017).

Field-Ready Monitoring Routine

• Weigh in pre-session and post-session/match
• Track body mass changes and adjust rehydration volume accordingly
• Use urine-related measures as a practical check when available (Sebastiá-Rico et al., 2024)

Micronutrients: Performance Relevance + Food-First Reality in Elite Squads

Micronutrients play a documented role in sports performance, with research exploring the relationships between specific vitamins, minerals, and athletic output (Ghazzawi et al., 2023). In elite contexts, the key practical point isn’t “take everything,” but identify and correct what’s missing—especially across long seasons and high load phases.

Why Micronutrients Matter for Football Performance

When you’re training and competing at high volume, certain micronutrients get depleted faster. Iron status affects oxygen transport and endurance capacity—critical for maintaining high-intensity running output in the final 15 minutes of matches. Vitamin D influences muscle function, bone health, and immune response, which matters when you can’t afford to miss training sessions during crucial parts of the season.

B vitamins support energy metabolism when your demands are elevated across congested fixture periods. Magnesium and zinc play roles in recovery, adaptation, and maintaining testosterone levels under heavy training stress. Calcium supports bone health and neuromuscular function, particularly important for athletes managing the physical demands of contact and high-impact actions.

The Problem with Blanket Supplementation

The issue with blanket supplementation is that it wastes money and can create imbalances. What matters is knowing your individual status through blood work, especially during pre-season, mid-season grind, and recovery phases. If your iron stores are optimal, loading more won’t make you faster. But if you’re borderline deficient and didn’t know it, that’s costing you performance and recovery capacity every day.

Common deficiency patterns in football include:

• Iron deficiency in female players and male players with high training volumes
• Vitamin D insufficiency, especially in players training primarily indoors or in northern latitudes during winter months
• Magnesium depletion during periods of high sweat loss
• Zinc deficiency during heavy training blocks with inadequate dietary variety

Practical rule: Micronutrient supplementation is most appropriate when a deficiency is documented or a specific physiological demand exists (Ghazzawi et al., 2023). Get tested. Address gaps. Don’t guess. Your performance nutrition should be as precise as your training plan—targeted interventions based on your data, not generic protocols based on what everyone else is doing.

Gut Training, Microbiome, and Probiotics: Reducing Gastrointestinal Risk and Improving Fueling Reliability

“Training the gut” describes the adaptability of gastrointestinal function when athletes repeatedly practice fueling strategies in training (Jeukendrup, 2017). In football, this is the difference between:

• Being able to take carbohydrates and fluids under stress, or
• Being forced to back off intake because of discomfort

Why Gut Training Matters in Football

Gastrointestinal distress during matches can derail your nutrition strategy completely. If you can’t tolerate carbohydrate intake during halftime or during breaks in play, you’re losing a critical fueling opportunity. If pre-match meals cause discomfort, you’re starting the game compromised. If post-match nutrition causes issues, you’re delaying recovery when the clock is already ticking toward your next session.

The gut is trainable. Regular exposure to your planned match-day nutrition protocol improves tolerance, increases carbohydrate absorption capacity, and reduces the likelihood of GI distress when it matters most. This adaptation takes time—typically 2-4 weeks of consistent practice—but it’s one of the most reliable ways to improve your ability to execute your fueling plan under match intensity.

Gut Training Plan (Simple, Repeatable)

1. Choose your match-day carbohydrate sources (drink/gel/food)
2. Practice them in training at the same timing you plan to use on match day
3. Progressively increase toward match needs if tolerance improves (Jeukendrup, 2017)

Start with smaller amounts during easier training sessions, then gradually increase both the quantity and the intensity of the session where you practice fueling. By the time you reach match day, your gut should be fully adapted to handle the planned intake without causing problems.

Microbiome Evidence in Elite Athletes

Elite athletes show distinct gut microbiome profiles compared to sedentary individuals (Scheiman et al., 2019). Research has identified specific microbes linked to lactate metabolism that may provide performance advantages (Scheiman et al., 2019). The role of the gut microbiome and probiotics in sports performance contexts continues to develop as an active area of investigation (Jarrett et al., 2025).

The practical implication: gut health isn’t just about avoiding discomfort—it’s about optimizing your body’s ability to extract and utilize the nutrients you’re providing. A healthy, diverse gut microbiome may support better recovery, improved immune function, and enhanced adaptation to training stress.

Supplements in Elite Football: What to Use, How to Implement, and How to Reduce Risk

This section is written for professional environments where supplements must be integrated into a performance system, not taken randomly (Oliveira et al., 2017; Trexler et al., 2015).

Supplement Decision Sequence

1. Foundation first: Are you meeting energy needs, carbohydrate targets, hydration, and recovery nutrition? (Impey et al., 2018; McDermott et al., 2017; Poulios et al., 2018)
2. Objective: What is the performance purpose (match readiness, congested recovery, repeated sprint support, gastrointestinal tolerance)?
3. Trial: Test in training, not in competition (Jeukendrup, 2017)
4. Control: Use trusted products, with staff oversight, and avoid uncontrolled sourcing (Oliveira et al., 2017)

Evidence-Based Supplement Options

Caffeine

Typical dose: ~3 mg/kg (range 2–4) about 45–60 min pre-kick-off

Emphasis: Individual tolerance testing in training; avoid excessive doses due to side effects

Football relevance: Used to support alertness and performance under match demands (Oliveira et al., 2017)

Caffeine can enhance sprint performance, jump height, and cognitive function during matches—particularly valuable in the later stages when fatigue accumulates. However, individual responses vary significantly. Some players experience enhanced focus and physical output; others experience jitteriness, anxiety, or gastrointestinal issues. The only way to know your response is to test it systematically in training that replicates match demands.

Creatine Monohydrate

Loading: 0.3 g/kg/day for 5–7 days, then maintenance 3–5 g/day

Practical note: Monitor body mass changes and positional considerations

Football relevance: Used for repeated high-intensity actions (Oliveira et al., 2017)

Creatine supports the phosphocreatine system, which fuels explosive actions like sprints, jumps, and changes of direction. For football, this translates to better maintenance of sprint speed across repeated efforts and improved ability to execute high-intensity actions late in matches. The trade-off is potential water retention and slight body mass increase, which needs to be evaluated against your positional demands and movement efficiency.

Dietary Nitrate (e.g., Beetroot Juice)

Dose: ~5–8 mmol nitrate 2–3 hours pre-kick-off; sometimes multi-day loading 3–7 days

Practical note: Trial in training; monitor gastrointestinal tolerance

Football relevance: Used as an ergogenic strategy in team sport contexts (Oliveira et al., 2017)

Nitrate supplementation can improve exercise efficiency and high-intensity performance. The timing matters—peak plasma nitrite levels occur approximately 2-3 hours after ingestion. Some players respond well; others experience no benefit or encounter GI issues. The magenta-colored urine is harmless but notable. Test this well before considering it for match day use.

Beta-Alanine

Dose: 3–6 g/day for 4–8 weeks in divided doses

Side effect: Paresthesia (tingling) mitigated by splitting doses

Evidence base: Beta-alanine is discussed in sports nutrition position statements (Trexler et al., 2015)

Beta-alanine increases muscle carnosine, which buffers hydrogen ions during high-intensity exercise. This may support performance in repeated sprint situations and high-intensity efforts. The tingling sensation (paresthesia) is harmless but can be distracting if you’re not expecting it. This supplement requires consistent daily use for 4-8 weeks to build effective muscle carnosine levels—it’s not an acute, match-day intervention.

Micronutrients

Supplementation when deficiency is documented or medically indicated (Ghazzawi et al., 2023)

Don’t supplement micronutrients based on assumptions. Blood testing should guide any micronutrient supplementation strategy, with particular attention to iron, vitamin D, and magnesium in football populations.

Supplements Implementation Table

Photobiomodulation: How It Fits Into an Elite Performance System

Photobiomodulation (PBM) involves the use of red and near-infrared light to influence cellular function and has been examined in relation to sports performance (Ferraresi et al., 2016). Recommendations for PBM use in exercise performance enhancement and post-exercise recovery have been published (Leal-Junior et al., 2019). The underlying mechanisms include anti-inflammatory effects and nitric oxide release under red/near-infrared radiation (Hamblin, 2017; Karu, 2010; Lohr et al., 2009). Applied performance research includes work examining PBM effects on endurance running outcomes and muscle soreness (Peserico et al., 2019).

Practical Application in Football

PBM might fit into recovery protocols between matches during congested periods, potentially supporting reduced muscle soreness and faster restoration of physical qualities. However, the evidence base in football-specific contexts remains limited, and the equipment requirements mean this is typically managed at team/facility level rather than individual athlete implementation.

Practical rule for athletes: PBM is an adjunct. If carbohydrate availability, hydration, and recovery nutrition execution are inconsistent, PBM will not compensate for missing fundamentals (Impey et al., 2018; McDermott et al., 2017; Poulios et al., 2018; Leal-Junior et al., 2019).

Practical Weekly Table: What to Do by Day Type

FAQ: Professional and Elite Footballers

Q: We have two matches in 5–7 days. What do I change immediately?

You tighten the first recovery window after the first match: carbohydrate restoration and post-match protein execution become non-negotiable. Residual fatigue persists after matches (Silva et al., 2018), and post-game high protein intake may improve recovery of football-specific performance during congested fixtures (Poulios et al., 2018). Use the 0–4 hour recovery plan (carbohydrates + protein + rehydration) from the match-day playbook on the first match so you don’t start the week already behind.

Q: I’m fine early but drop off late in the match. What’s the first nutrition fix?

Audit carbohydrate availability across the 24–36 hours pre-match and your pre-kick-off carbohydrate window. Carbohydrate periodization is designed to match fuel availability to the work required (Impey et al., 2018), and football performance under fatigue is sensitive to readiness (Mohr et al., 2005). If you miss the day-before and pre-match carbohydrate targets, late-match output is the first place it shows.

Q: I get stomach issues on match day. How do I fix it without guessing?

Stop changing inputs on match day and implement gut training. Training the gut improves tolerance to fueling strategies during exercise (Jeukendrup, 2017). Choose one match-day plan (drink/gel/snack timing), rehearse it in training at the same intensity and timing, and only adjust one variable at a time (Jeukendrup, 2017).

Q: Hot conditions wreck me. What’s the simplest measurable approach?

Use body mass change to quantify sweat loss and set rehydration volume. Heat increases sweating response in elite players (Shirreffs et al., 2005), and hydration markers vary by environment and athlete characteristics (Sebastiá-Rico et al., 2024). Use the 150% replacement approach and pair it with planned pre-match hydration (McDermott et al., 2017).

Q: Should I take caffeine for matches?

Only if you’ve trialed it in training and it fits your response profile. The practical dose range and timing are established; caffeine is commonly used in football contexts to support performance (Oliveira et al., 2017). Treat it as an individual tool, not a team-wide default.

Q: Creatine makes me heavier—does that mean I should avoid it?

It means you must evaluate it against your role and match demands. Potential body mass increases are a trade-off to consider, which is particularly relevant in football positional demands. Creatine monohydrate is used as a performance supplement in football settings (Oliveira et al., 2017). Decide with performance staff and verify how it affects your outputs.

Q: Is photobiomodulation worth integrating?

PBM has published recommendations for performance and recovery contexts (Leal-Junior et al., 2019) and has been examined in sports performance and human muscle tissue research (Ferraresi et al., 2016). The practical answer is: it can be integrated as an adjunct after your core system (carbohydrates, hydration, recovery nutrition) is already consistently executed (Impey et al., 2018; McDermott et al., 2017; Poulios et al., 2018).

Conclusion: Build a System That Survives When the Schedule Gets Ugly

Elite football rewards the athlete who can reproduce performance on command—again and again—despite fatigue, travel, heat, and congested fixtures (Mohr et al., 2005; Silva et al., 2018). The practical goal of your nutrition system isn’t to “eat well.” It’s to arrive at kick-off fueled and hydrated, and exit the match with recovery already in motion, so your next performance isn’t compromised by avoidable deficits (Impey et al., 2018; McDermott et al., 2017; Poulios et al., 2018).

If you want one standard to judge your plan by, use this: Does it still work when the schedule gets ugly? When kick-off moves, when you can’t drink much in-play, when you have two matches in a week, when you travel immediately post-match, and when heat changes sweat loss (Shirreffs et al., 2005; Sebastiá-Rico et al., 2024). A plan that only works on perfect weeks is not an elite plan.

Your Next Steps: Execution, Not More Theory

1. Choose your carbohydrate periodization targets based on day type and lock them in for the next microcycle (Impey et al., 2018; Pueyo et al., 2024)
2. Build match day backward from kick-off and rehearse the same fueling and hydration sequence in training until it’s automatic (Jeukendrup, 2017; McDermott et al., 2017)
3. Treat the first hours post-match as a performance session, especially during congestion—because recovery quality determines what you can express in the next fixture (Poulios et al., 2018; Silva et al., 2018)
4. Add supplements and adjunct tools only when your fundamentals are already consistent, and only as planned, trialed interventions (Oliveira et al., 2017; Trexler et al., 2015; Leal-Junior et al., 2019)

Do that, and you move from “trying to recover” to controlling readiness—which is exactly what separates professional routines from amateur ones in elite football.

References

1. Ferraresi, C., Huang, Y.-Y., & Hamblin, M. R. (2016). Photobiomodulation in human muscle tissue: An advantage in sports performance? Journal of Biophotonics, 9(11–12), 1273–1299. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201600176
2. Ghazzawi, H. A., Hussain, M. A., Raziq, K. M., Alsendi, K. K., Alaamer, R. O., Jaradat, M., … Jahrami, H. (2023). Exploring the relationship between micronutrients and athletic performance: A comprehensive scientific systematic review of the literature in sports medicine. Sports, 11(6), 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11060109
3. Hamblin, M. R. (2017). Mechanisms and applications of the anti-inflammatory effects of photobiomodulation. AIMS Biophysics, 4(3), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.3934/biophy.2017.3.337
4. Impey, S. G., Hearris, M. A., Hammond, K. M., Bartlett, J. D., Louis, J., Close, G. L., & Morton, J. P. (2018). Fuel for the work required: A theoretical framework for carbohydrate periodization and the glycogen threshold hypothesis. Sports Medicine, 48(5), 1031–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0867-7
5. Jarrett, H., Medlin, S., & Morehen, J. C. (2025). The role of the gut microbiome and probiotics in sports performance: A narrative review update. Nutrients, 17(4), 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17040690
6. Jeukendrup A. E. (2017). Training the Gut for Athletes. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 47(Suppl 1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0690-6
7. Karu, T. I. (2010). Multiple roles of cytochrome c oxidase in mammalian cells under action of red and IR-A radiation. IUBMB Life, 62(8), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.359
8. Kazemi, A., Racil, G., & Ahmadi Hekmatikar, A. H. (2023). Improved physical performance of elite soccer players based on GPS results after 4 days of carbohydrate loading followed by 3 days of low carbohydrate diet. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2023.2258837
9. Leal-Junior, E. C. P., Lopes-Martins, R. Á. B., & Bjordal, J. M. (2019). Clinical and scientific recommendations for the use of photobiomodulation therapy in exercise performance enhancement and post-exercise recovery: current evidence and future directions. Brazilian journal of physical therapy, 23(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.12.002
10. Lohr, N. L., Keszler, A., Pratt, P., Bienengraber, M., Warltier, D. C., & Hogg, N. (2009). Enhancement of nitric oxide release from nitrosyl hemoglobin and nitrosyl myoglobin by red/near infrared radiation: Potential role in cardioprotection. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 47(2), 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.03.009
11. McDermott, B. P., Anderson, S. A., Armstrong, L. E., Casa, D. J., Cheuvront, S. N., Cooper, L., Kenney, W. L., O’Connor, F. G., & Roberts, W. O. (2017). National Athletic Trainers’ Association Position Statement: Fluid Replacement for the Physically Active. Journal of athletic training, 52(9), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-52.9.02
12. Mohr, M., Krustrup, P., & Bangsbo, J. (2005). Fatigue in soccer: a brief review. Journal of sports sciences, 23(6), 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400021286
13. Mountjoy, M., Sundgot-Borgen, J., Burke, L., Carter, S., Constantini, N., Lebrun, C., Meyer, N., Sherman, R., Steffen, K., Budgett, R., & Ljungqvist, A. (2014). The IOC consensus statement: beyond the Female Athlete Triad–Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S). British journal of sports medicine, 48(7), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-093502
14. Peplow, P. V., Chung, T.-Y., & Baxter, G. D. (2010). Laser photobiomodulation of wound healing: A review of experimental studies in mouse and rat animal models. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 28(3), 291–325. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2008.2446
15. Peserico, C. S., Zagatto, A. M., & Machado, F. A. (2019). Effects of endurance running training associated with photobiomodulation on 5-km performance and muscle soreness: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00211
16. Poulios, A., Fatouros, I. G., Mohr, M., Draganidis, D. K., Deli, C., Papanikolaou, K., Sovatzidis, A., Nakopoulou, T., Ermidis, G., Tzatzakis, T., Laschou, V. C., Georgakouli, K., Koulouris, A., Tsimeas, P., Chatzinikolaou, A., Karagounis, L. G., Batsilas, D., Krustrup, P., & Jamurtas, A. Z. (2018). Post-Game High Protein Intake May Improve Recovery of Football-Specific Performance during a Congested Game Fixture: Results from the PRO-FOOTBALL Study. Nutrients, 10(4), 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10040494
17. Pueyo, M., Arjol, J. L., & Navarro, F. (2024). Influence of carbohydrate intake on different parameters of soccer players’ performance: Systematic review. Nutrients, 16(21), 3731. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16213731
18. Rollo, I., & Williams, C. (2023). Carbohydrate nutrition and skill performance in soccer. Sports Medicine, 53(Suppl 1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01876-3
19. Scheiman, J., Luber, J. M., Chavkin, T. A., MacDonald, T., Tung, A., Pham, L. D., Wibowo, M. C., Wurth, R. C., Punthambaker, S., Tierney, B. T., Yang, Z., Hattab, M. W., Avila-Pacheco, J., Clish, C. B., Lessard, S., Church, G. M., & Kostic, A. D. (2019). Meta-omics analysis of elite athletes identifies a performance-enhancing microbe that functions via lactate metabolism. Nature medicine, 25(7), 1104–1109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0485-4
20. Sebastiá-Rico, J., Soriano, J. M., Sanchis-Chordà, J., García-Fernández, Á. F., López-Mateu, P., de la Cruz Marcos, S., & Martínez-Sanz, J. M. (2024). Analysis of Fluid Balance and Urine Values in Elite Soccer Players: Impact of Different Environments, Playing Positions, Sexes, and Competitive Levels. Nutrients, 16(6), 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16060903
21. Shirreffs, S. M., Aragon-Vargas, L. F., Chamorro, M., Maughan, R. J., Serratosa, L., & Zachwieja, J. J. (2005). The sweating response of elite professional soccer players to training in the heat. International journal of sports medicine, 26(2), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-821112
22. Silva, J. R., Rumpf, M. C., Hertzog, M., Castagna, C., Farooq, A., Girard, O., & Hader, K. (2018). Acute and Residual Soccer Match-Related Fatigue: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 48(3), 539–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0798-8
23. Trexler, E. T., Smith-Ryan, A. E., Stout, J. R., Hoffman, J. R., Wilborn, C. D., Sale, C., … Antonio, J. (2015). International society of sports nutrition position stand: Beta-alanine. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 12, 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-015-0090