Nutrition and Hydration Strategies for Competing in the Heat

Introduction

Competing in hot and humid conditions imposes unique physiological and metabolic challenges that can significantly compromise athletic performance. Heat stress increases cardiovascular strain by up to 17 beats per minute, accelerates glycogen utilization by 30-80%, impairs gastrointestinal function, and substantially raises the risk of exertional heat illness—one of the two leading causes of sudden death in athletes. Without strategic nutrition and hydration strategies for competing in the heat, even the most well-trained athletes face performance decrements and serious health risks.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) emphasizes that effective hydration strategies for athletes must be practical, individualized, and integrated with event logistics—not merely theoretical sweat-loss replacement models applied universally (Racinais et al., 2023). Groundbreaking laboratory research confirms that heat stress fundamentally alters carbohydrate metabolism, reducing the oxidation of ingested carbohydrate by approximately 20% even when hydration is preserved (Mougin et al., 2025). This metabolic disruption means athletes face a critical paradox: increased fuel demands coupled with reduced fuel availability from ingested sources.

This article translates current evidence from IOC consensus guidelines and cutting-edge metabolic research into practical, actionable guidance for elite athletes preparing to compete in extreme heat conditions.

Heat Stress Physiology and Nutritional Implications

Understanding the physiological cascade triggered by heat exposure is essential for developing effective nutritional interventions. Heat stress during exercise increases skin blood flow demands to facilitate evaporative cooling, which competes with skeletal muscle perfusion and elevates cardiovascular strain—a phenomenon known as cardiovascular drift (González-Alonso et al., 1999; Sawka et al., 2011). Research demonstrates that end-exercise heart rate increases by an average of 17 beats·min⁻¹ in hot versus temperate conditions, while core temperature rises by 0.43°C despite similar workloads.

Hypohydration (>2% body mass loss) further intensifies this physiological strain, increases the perception of effort, and accelerates the onset of fatigue. Even modest dehydration of 1-2% body mass loss impairs thermoregulation and cardiovascular function, making proper sports nutrition heat stress management critical (Sawka, Cheuvront, & Kenefick, 2015).

Metabolic Disruption: Perhaps most significant for performance, heat fundamentally changes how the body processes fuel. Recent controlled research reveals that despite maintaining euhydration, the oxidation of ingested carbohydrates decreases by approximately 18-20% during prolonged exercise in heat (34°C) compared to temperate conditions (19°C). This reduction occurs because heat stress decreases splanchnic blood flow, impairs gastric emptying, and compromises intestinal glucose transport capacity. Consequently, athletes become more dependent on limited endogenous glycogen stores, accelerating depletion and hastening fatigue (Jentjens et al., 2002; Mougin et al., 2025).

Table 1. Key Physiological Responses Affecting Nutrition in Heat

Response	Magnitude of Change	Impact on Performance
↑ Skin blood flow	Redistributes 15-25% of cardiac output	Reduces muscle perfusion; earlier fatigue onset
↑ Cardiovascular strain	Heart rate +17 beats·min⁻¹	Reduces sustainable exercise intensity
↓ Exogenous CHO oxidation	Reduced by 18-20%	Increased reliance on limited glycogen stores
↑ Core temperature	+0.43°C during exercise	Accelerates central nervous system fatigue
↑ GI stress likelihood	2-3x higher incidence	Lower tolerance for large carbohydrate feeds

IOC Nutrition & Hydration Framework for Hot Environments

The IOC consensus statement on sport in extreme heat underscores a critical principle: athletes cannot rely solely on in-exercise fluid and fuel intake to meet physiological needs due to fundamental limits in gastric emptying (~1 L·h⁻¹ maximum), intestinal absorption capacity, practical accessibility during competition, and gastrointestinal tolerance under heat stress (Racinais et al., 2023). Instead, optimal hydration and fueling are cumulative processes that begin days before competition and continue through recovery.

Table 2. IOC-Derived Applied Principles for Heat Competition

Principle	Practical Implementation	Supporting Evidence
Hydration is cumulative	Emphasize daily hydration status (body mass <1-2% variation, urine specific gravity <1.020); not only competition day	Days of consistent hydration optimize plasma volume
In-exercise intake has physiological limits	Plan comprehensive pre- and post-exercise fueling; accept that full replacement during exercise is impossible	Gastric emptying maxes at ~1 L·h⁻¹; many athletes sweat 2-3 L·h⁻¹
Individual variability is profound	Customize plans based on measured sweat rate, sweat sodium concentration, and GI tolerance	Sweat rates vary 3-fold between athletes in identical conditions
Gut tolerance is compromised in heat	Use conservative, well-practiced fueling strategies; reduce carbohydrate intake rates from cool-condition plans	Heat-induced splanchnic hypoperfusion increases GI distress risk

This framework represents a fundamental shift from generic hydration advice to personalized, evidence-based strategies that account for the realities of competition in extreme conditions.

Evidence-Based Hydration Strategies

Understanding Individual Fluid Needs

One of the most significant findings from recent elite athlete heat acclimation nutrition research is the extraordinary variability in individual sweat responses. Among elite athletes exercising under identical environmental conditions (same temperature, humidity, intensity, and duration), whole-body sweat rates can vary more than threefold—from less than 0.5 L·h⁻¹ to over 3 L·h⁻¹ (Sekiguchi et al., 2025). This variability renders one-size-fits-all hydration recommendations not just suboptimal but potentially dangerous.

Table 3. Personal Factors Influencing Fluid Needs

Factor	Specific Influence	Quantified Impact
Body size & composition	Larger surface area increases evaporative potential	72 kg athlete: ~1.7 L over 100 min in 34°C heat
Exercise intensity	Greater metabolic heat production drives sweating	Each 10% increase in intensity raises sweat rate ~15-20%
Heat acclimation status	Acclimated athletes sweat earlier and more profusely	+163 mL·h⁻¹ increase after 8-10 days acclimation
Environmental conditions	Temperature and humidity affect evaporative capacity	Each 1 kPa increase in humidity requires +37 mL·h⁻¹ fluid
Sport modality	Running induces higher sweat rates than cycling	Running: vertical motion and greater muscle mass recruitment
Event logistics	Time between breaks determines feasible intake	Continuous events (marathon) vs. interval sports (tennis)

Practical Target: Rather than attempting perfect fluid replacement—which is physiologically impossible for many athletes—evidence supports maintaining body mass losses below 2% during exercise as a practical target to minimize cardiovascular strain and performance decrements (Sawka et al., 2007; Racinais et al., 2023). For a 70 kg athlete, this represents approximately 1.4 kg maximum loss, or roughly 1.4 L of uncompensated fluid deficit.

Assessment Protocol: Athletes should determine individual sweat rates through systematic body mass measurements (pre-post exercise, corrected for fluid intake and urine losses) during training sessions that replicate competition intensity, duration, and environmental conditions.

Sodium & Electrolyte Replacement Strategies

Heat exposure dramatically increases sweat volume, and sodium plays multifaceted roles in maintaining performance: it drives thirst sensation, enhances fluid retention, maintains plasma volume, supports nerve conduction, and may help prevent exercise-associated muscle cramping when sodium deficits reach 20-30% of the exchangeable sodium pool.

Critical Context: The IOC explicitly states that athletes experiencing profuse sweating in heat should not follow general population sodium-restriction guidance. Public health recommendations to limit sodium intake do not apply to athletes losing 2-4 grams of sodium through sweat during competition (Racinais et al., 2023).

Table 4. Evidence-Based Sodium Recommendations for Heat Competition

Scenario	Sodium Recommendation	Physiological Rationale
Events >60–90 minutes	0.5-0.7 g·L⁻¹ in consumed fluids	Maintains osmotic drive for fluid retention; stimulates thirst
High sweat sodium concentration (“salty sweaters”)	Up to 1.5 g·L⁻¹ or 1.5 g·h⁻¹	Prevents excessive sodium depletion; reduces cramping risk
Warm, humid conditions (high sweat rates)	Increase sodium as tolerated	Total sodium loss = rate × concentration (both elevated)
Multi-day competitions	Monitor cumulative sodium via meals and fluids	Serial competition compounds losses; daily restoration essential
Post-heat acclimation	Re-assess individual needs	Sweat [Na⁺] decreases (-20 mmol·L⁻¹) but volume increases (+163 mL·h⁻¹)

Important Nuance: Heat acclimation (typically 8-10 days of 90-minute exposures at 35-40°C) reduces sweat sodium concentration by approximately 20 mmol·L⁻¹ through improved sodium reabsorption. However, total sodium loss can remain similar or even increase because acclimation simultaneously increases whole-body sweat rate by approximately 163 mL·h⁻¹ (Périard et al., 2015; Sekiguchi et al., 2025). Athletes and practitioners must therefore re-evaluate sodium strategies after acclimation rather than assuming reduced requirements.

Optimizing Carbohydrate Intake in the Heat

Understanding Heat-Induced Metabolic Challenges

Heat stress creates a metabolic paradox for carbohydrate intake in the heat: the body’s reliance on carbohydrate metabolism increases by 30-80% compared to temperate conditions, yet simultaneously, the capacity to oxidize ingested carbohydrates decreases substantially. Controlled research demonstrates that average exogenous carbohydrate oxidation during prolonged running decreases by 20% in heat (34°C: 0.43 g·min⁻¹) versus temperate conditions (19°C: 0.54 g·min⁻¹), with peak oxidation rates reduced by 18% (Mougin et al., 2025).

Mechanistic Understanding: This reduction occurs through multiple pathways:

1. Splanchnic hypoperfusion: Blood flow redistribution to skin reduces gastrointestinal blood flow by 20-40%
2. Impaired gastric emptying: Core temperatures >39°C slow gastric emptying by 15-18 mL·min⁻¹
3. Compromised intestinal absorption: Heat-induced gut hypoxia impairs ATP-dependent SGLT1 glucose transporters
4. Increased endogenous glucose: Elevated catecholamine-driven hepatic glucose output may competitively inhibit exogenous glucose uptake

To compensate for reduced exogenous fuel availability, endogenous carbohydrate oxidation increases by 13% (2.10 vs 1.86 g·min⁻¹), accelerating glycogen depletion and hastening fatigue (Mougin et al., 2025).

Practical Carbohydrate Strategies for Competition

Understanding these metabolic constraints allows athletes to optimize rather than maximize carbohydrate delivery, prioritizing gastrointestinal tolerance and absorption efficiency over aggressive intake rates that may cause distress without providing additional fuel.

Table 5. Heat-Adapted Carbohydrate Fueling Strategies

Strategy	Specific Recommendation	Evidence-Based Rationale
Intake rate	Moderate: 30-60 g·h⁻¹ (vs 60-90 g·h⁻¹ in cool conditions)	Higher rates exceed absorption capacity in heat; increase GI distress risk
Carbohydrate type	Multiple transportable: glucose:fructose (1:0.8 ratio)	Engages SGLT1 and GLUT5 transporters; GLUT5 less affected by hypoxia
Delivery pattern	Frequent, small doses (15-20 g every 15-20 min)	Reduces gastric volume and pressure; improves tolerance
Concentration	6-8% solution (60-80 g·L⁻¹)	Higher concentrations delay gastric emptying in heat
Beverage temperature	Cool: 10-15°C	Enhances palatability; increases voluntary intake; provides minor cooling
Pre-competition gut training	Practice exact strategy in heat during training	Enhances intestinal absorption capacity; identifies individual tolerance limits

Critical Warning: Aggressive fueling protocols using ≥90 g·h⁻¹ (common in cool-condition endurance events) may be poorly tolerated and ineffective during competition in extreme heat. These strategies should be tested extensively in heat-specific training before competition implementation. Running appears particularly susceptible to gastrointestinal issues compared to cycling, likely due to vertical mechanical stress and greater abdominal muscle recruitment (Jeukendrup, 2017).

Pre- and Post-Competition Nutrition

Pre-Competition Nutrition Strategies

Hydration and fueling before competition are not optional preparatory measures but essential prerequisites for performance and safety. The physiological reality is clear: in-exercise intake cannot compensate for starting deficits because absorption capacity is limited and immediate pre-competition consumption causes gastrointestinal distress (Racinais et al., 2023).

Table 6. Pre-Heat Competition Priorities

Focus Area	Evidence-Based Action	Timing Window
Cumulative hydration	Maintain daily body mass <1-2% variation; urine specific gravity <1.020	2-3 days pre-competition
Pre-event fluid loading	6 mL·kg⁻¹ body mass every 2-3 hours	12-4 hours pre-event
Sodium inclusion	Consume sodium with fluids and meals (normal dietary intake typically adequate)	Throughout pre-event period
Carbohydrate intake	Low-fiber, low-fat, easily digestible sources (1-4 g·kg⁻¹ depending on event duration)	3-4 hours pre-start
Final fluid bolus	5-7 mL·kg⁻¹ (~400 mL for 70 kg athlete)	2 hours pre-start
Avoidance strategy	No large fluid/food boluses; avoid high-fiber, high-fat, or gas-producing foods	Final 60 minutes

Post-Competition Recovery Nutrition

Following competition in extreme heat, athletes face prolonged recovery demands due to sustained thermal strain, continued sweating for 30-60 minutes post-exercise, maintained cutaneous blood flow, and depleted glycogen and sodium stores. Recovery nutrition must address all these factors systematically.

Table 7. Post-Heat Competition Recovery Priorities

Physiological Goal	Nutritional Tactic	Target Timing
Restore plasma volume	Consume 100-150% of body mass loss in fluids with sodium	Within 4-6 hours
Replenish sodium stores	Replace estimated sweat sodium losses (typically 2-4 g total)	Throughout recovery period
Accelerate glycogen resynthesis	1.0-1.2 g·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ carbohydrate for first 4 hours	Immediately post-competition
Support muscle repair	20-40 g high-quality protein	Within 2 hours
Reduce residual thermal strain	Cold water immersion (10-15°C) or ice baths	Immediately post-competition

Practical Example: Chocolate milk provides an evidence-based recovery option for lactose-tolerant athletes, offering a 4:1 carbohydrate-to-protein ratio, containing sodium, and demonstrating superior fluid retention compared to standard sports drinks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How much fluid should I drink during competition in the heat?

A: Focus on limiting dehydration to <2% body mass loss rather than attempting to match sweat losses exactly, which is physiologically impossible for most athletes. Use individualized hydration plans based on your measured sweat rate, gastrointestinal tolerance, and event logistics assessed during heat-specific training sessions (Sawka et al., 2007; Racinais et al., 2023). For a 70 kg athlete, this represents approximately 1.4 kg maximum loss.

Q: Should I consume electrolytes even if plain water tastes fine?

A: Yes, absolutely. Sodium is physiologically essential for fluid retention, maintaining plasma volume, sustaining thirst drive, and preventing hyponatremia. Include sodium in fluids at 0.5-0.7 g·L⁻¹ for all events exceeding 60-90 minutes or in high-humidity conditions. Plain water dilutes plasma sodium and impairs fluid retention (Racinais et al., 2023; Périard et al., 2015).

Q: Does competing in heat mean I need more total carbohydrates than in cool conditions?

A: Not necessarily more total carbohydrate, but you definitely need adjusted delivery strategies. Heat stress reduces your capacity to absorb and oxidize ingested carbohydrates by approximately 20%, while simultaneously increasing reliance on endogenous stores. Use moderate intake rates (30-60 g·h⁻¹) with multiple transportable carbohydrates (glucose:fructose) to optimize absorption without overwhelming compromised gastrointestinal function (Jeukendrup, 2017; Mougin et al., 2025).

Q: When should I start implementing my hydration plan before an important event?

A: Heat-specific hydration planning begins 2-3 days before competition, not the morning of the event. Build cumulative hydration status by monitoring daily body mass variation (<1-2%), urine specific gravity (<1.020), and maintaining consistent fluid and sodium intake across training days leading into competition. This approach optimizes plasma volume and ensures you begin competition in an ideal hydration state (Racinais et al., 2023).

Q: How important is practicing my heat nutrition strategy during training?

A: Absolutely critical. Training your gastrointestinal tolerance, testing fluid access logistics, and validating your nutrition strategy in environmental conditions replicating competition is essential before implementation in high-stakes competition. “Gut training”—repeated exposure to your planned carbohydrate intake during heat stress—enhances intestinal absorption capacity, identifies individual tolerance limits, and builds confidence in your strategy.

Q: Will consuming cold fluids provide meaningful benefits beyond hydration?

A: Yes. Cold or cool fluids (10-15°C) significantly improve palatability and reduce gastrointestinal discomfort, making it substantially easier to consume necessary fluids and carbohydrates when appetite and gut comfort are compromised by heat stress. While the direct cooling effect is modest, enhanced voluntary intake is a major practical benefit supported by competition evidence.

Conclusion

Elite athletes competing in extreme heat must implement nutrition and hydration strategies for competing in the heat that are evidence-based, individualized to their physiological responses, and operationally realistic within their sport’s constraints. The integration of IOC consensus guidance, cutting-edge carbohydrate metabolism research, and applied fluid and sodium management strategies provides a comprehensive framework that enhances performance, accelerates recovery, and critically protects athlete health and safety.

Key implementation principles include: maintaining <2% body mass loss through individualized hydration plans, moderating carbohydrate intake to 30-60 g·h⁻¹ with multiple transportable sources, implementing strategic sodium replacement at 0.5-1.5 g·h⁻¹ based on individual losses, emphasizing cumulative pre-competition hydration, and systematically testing all strategies during heat-specific training before competition deployment.

Rigorous preparation, systematic monitoring, and evidence-based adaptation ensure these strategies deliver their full potential when performance and safety matter most.

References

• González-Alonso, J., Teller, C., Andersen, S. L., Jensen, F. B., Hyldig, T., & Nielsen, B. (1999). Influence of body temperature on the development of fatigue during prolonged exercise in the heat. Journal of Applied Physiology, 86(3), 1032–1039. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1999.86.3.1032
• Jeukendrup, A. E. (2017). Training the gut for athletes. Sports Medicine, 47(Suppl 1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0690-6
• Jentjens, R. L., Moseley, L., Waring, R. H., Harding, L. K., & Jeukendrup, A. E. (2002). Oxidation of combined ingestion of glucose and fructose during exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology, 96(4), 1277–1284. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00974.2001
• Mougin, L., Horner, M., Edwards, D., Nickels, M., Taylor, L., James, L. J., & Mears, S. A. (2025). Heat stress impairs exogenous carbohydrate oxidation during prolonged running when maintaining euhydration. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 139(6), 1436–1446. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00873.2025
• Périard, J. D., Racinais, S., & Sawka, M. N. (2015). Adaptations and mechanisms of human heat acclimation: Applications for competitive athletes and sports. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 25(Suppl 1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12408
• Racinais, S., Hosokawa, Y., Akama, T., Bermon, S., Bigard, X., Casa, D. J., Grundstein, A., Jay, O., Massey, A., Migliorini, S., Mountjoy, M., Nikolic, N., Pitsiladis, Y. P., Schobersberger, W., Steinacker, J. M., Yamasawa, F., Zideman, D. A., Engebretsen, L., & Budgett, R. (2023). IOC consensus statement on recommendations and regulations for sport events in the heat. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 57(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105942
• Sawka, M. N., Burke, L. M., Eichner, E. R., Maughan, R. J., Montain, S. J., & Stachenfeld, N. S. (2007). American College of Sports Medicine position stand: Exercise and fluid replacement. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 39(2), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e31802ca597
• Sawka, M. N., Cheuvront, S. N., & Kenefick, R. W. (2015). Hypohydration and human performance: Impact of environment and physiological mechanisms. Sports Medicine, 45(Suppl 1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0395-7
• Sawka, M. N., Leon, L. R., Montain, S. J., & Sonna, L. A. (2011). Integrated physiological mechanisms of exercise performance, adaptation, and maladaptation to heat stress. Comprehensive Physiology, 1(4), 1883–1928. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c100082
• Sekiguchi, Y., Adams, W. M., Hosokawa, Y., Benjamin, C. L., Stearns, R. L., Huggins, R. A., & Casa, D. J. (2025). Customizing individual heat mitigation strategies to optimize performance in elite athletes. Frontiers in Physiology, 16, 1380645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1380645